The world of plastic surgery has radically changed in recent decades, with body contouring and non-invasive procedures coming to the forefront. Having these options available has helped many men and woman achieve physical improvements they otherwise would have been unable to access.
It can be overwhelming trying to evaluate them. For example, between CoolSculpting® and truSculpt® 3D in Austin, TX, which is better?
How They Are Similar
Both truSculpt 3D and CoolSculpting are non-invasive procedures. Individuals can come in for a session during an extended lunch hour and return to work when they are done, no recovery time needed. With either option, up to 25 percent of the fat cells in the targeted area can be treated. More than one treatment may be necessary with either procedure to achieve optimal results.
How They Are Different
truSculpt and CoolSculpting have a lot in common, but the differences are key.
With truSculpt 3D in Austin, TX, the fat cells are heated to the point of destruction. This is accomplished through radiofrequency heat. It can work anywhere there is unwanted fat.
CoolSculpting, as the name suggests, uses cold temperatures to get the job done. It actually freezes fat cells until they crystallize and then the body removes them naturally. It can work wherever the amount of fat present is “pinchable.”
Why truSculpt 3D Gets More Done
The advantage of truSculpt comes from the radiofrequency heat it uses. While truSculpt targets fat cells, it can also help encourage skin tightening and cellulite reduction. It is also able to target areas without significant excess fat, meaning it can help people contour smaller areas with greater ease. TruSculpt also offers the ability to better target areas the Coolsculpting may not be able to reach.
Since truSculpt 3D is more flexible and offers more bang for your buck, it may be the superior choice for you.
